Weren't you for Edwards last week, after abandoning Obama because of Eviromental issues?  

My number one issue is ethics reform and Obama is in charge of that right now. His bill, if it were passed, would have effectively repaired what is really wrong with Washington DC.

No, heyAnita, you said you were for Edwards because he was solid on your number one issue, which is (or was) the environment.

I recognize that you are free to change your mind, of course.

He is a progressive and he is an outsider and isn't part of the baggage of the establishment in the Senate because he doesn't have a long voting history.  You can look at his Illinois voting record but most General Assembly people in Illinois vote the liberal line from  a liberal state of Illinois. I think Hillary Clinton stumbles in late December and early January when the Dems in the fall have to approve the funds for the Iraq war and Obama comes from behind and wins.

http://www.galluppoll.com/content/Defaul t.aspx?ci=27163

Sen. Hillary Clinton remains the dominant presidential front-runner among Democrats nationally, with twice the support as her nearest challenger. Sen. Barack Obama, former Sen. John Edwards, and former Vice President Al Gore are tightly bunched in second place, with all other candidates in low single digits. If Gore is removed from the ballot and his supporters' second-place choices substituted, Clinton's lead becomes even more dominant, with Obama and Edwards tied far behind.

These data were collected April 2-5, just as reports of Obama's first-quarter fundraising success were made public. The survey results suggest that while Obama may have had a great deal of financial momentum in the past quarter, it was not matched by any increase in voter support.

The trend for Obama has been relatively static. The Illinois senator ends up in this latest April poll essentially where he was last January; Obama gets exactly half of the vote given to Clinton.

Edwards has held his own during this time. He has averaged 13% across the five polls, and ends up at 15%. Edwards had one slightly weaker showing in early March, but in the next poll, taken shortly after his announcement that he would continue his campaign despite his wife Elizabeth's recurrence of cancer, his standing recovered.

Unannounced candidate Gore pulls in 14% of the vote of Democrats in this poll. He may have received a slight boost in polls conducted after his Oscar appearance, but the benefits he received appear to have subsided.  

Clinton's continued dominance as the front-runner across the five Gallup Polls conducted so far this year (and for that matter in national polls going back to 2005) is therefore remarkable. There has been some movement from poll to poll, as would be expected, but to this date, no other candidate has challenged her hegemony over the process.

The first-quarter fundraising reports announced last week provided an additional quantitative indicator of where the Democratic candidates stand in the race for their party's nomination. Obama received a good deal of positive press for his ability to come close to matching Clinton's first-quarter monetary total. The latest Gallup Poll was in the field when these results were made public; future polling will show whether publicity about fundraising has an effect on rank-and-file voters.

As of early April, the data show that despite holding his own with Clinton on the fundraising front, Obama continues to trail her by a considerable distance in national Democratic preferences, as do Edwards, Gore, and other third-tier candidates.  

I think it went, "gag me with a spoon."